Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Instrumentation.AWS] Support .NET 6 and resolve AoT warning #1547

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 26, 2024

Conversation

martincostello
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #1543.

Changes

  • Appropriate CHANGELOG.md updated for non-trivial changes

Comment on lines +131 to +158
#if NET6_0_OR_GREATER
[System.Diagnostics.CodeAnalysis.UnconditionalSuppressMessage(
"Trimming",
"IL2075",
Justification = "The reflected properties were already used by the AWS SDK's marshallers so the properties could not have been trimmed.")]
#endif
private static void AddRequestSpecificInformation(Activity activity, IRequestContext requestContext, string service)
{
if (AWSServiceHelper.ServiceParameterMap.TryGetValue(service, out string parameter))
if (AWSServiceHelper.ServiceParameterMap.TryGetValue(service, out var parameter))
{
AmazonWebServiceRequest request = requestContext.OriginalRequest;

var property = request.GetType().GetProperty(parameter);
if (property != null)
try
{
if (AWSServiceHelper.ParameterAttributeMap.TryGetValue(parameter, out string attribute))
var property = request.GetType().GetProperty(parameter);
if (property != null)
{
activity.SetTag(attribute, property.GetValue(request));
if (AWSServiceHelper.ParameterAttributeMap.TryGetValue(parameter, out var attribute))
{
activity.SetTag(attribute, property.GetValue(request));
}
}
}
catch (Exception)
{
// Guard against any reflection-related exceptions when running in AoT.
// See https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-dotnet-contrib/issues/1543#issuecomment-1907667722.
}
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 24, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 4 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (71655ce) 73.91% compared to head (2e68c2f) 80.62%.
Report is 125 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1547      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   73.91%   80.62%   +6.70%     
==========================================
  Files         267      113     -154     
  Lines        9615     3076    -6539     
==========================================
- Hits         7107     2480    -4627     
+ Misses       2508      596    -1912     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests-Solution 80.62% <88.57%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Coverage Δ
...Telemetry.Exporter.InfluxDB/InfluxDBEventSource.cs 60.00% <ø> (ø)
...ry.Exporter.InfluxDB/InfluxDBExporterExtensions.cs 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...metry.Exporter.InfluxDB/InfluxDBMetricsExporter.cs 84.61% <ø> (-3.85%) ⬇️
...Telemetry.Exporter.InfluxDB/PointDataExtensions.cs 87.50% <100.00%> (ø)
...ry.Exporter.InfluxDB/TelegrafPrometheusWriterV1.cs 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...ry.Exporter.InfluxDB/TelegrafPrometheusWriterV2.cs 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...stana/Implementation/InstanaExporterEventSource.cs 0.00% <ø> (ø)
...try.Exporter.Instana/Implementation/InstanaSpan.cs 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...orter.Instana/Implementation/InstanaSpanFactory.cs 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...er.Instana/Implementation/InstanaSpanSerializer.cs 93.79% <ø> (ø)
... and 31 more

... and 225 files with indirect coverage changes

@martincostello martincostello marked this pull request as ready for review January 24, 2024 10:30
@martincostello martincostello requested a review from a team January 24, 2024 10:31
@martincostello
Copy link
Contributor Author

FYI I've deployed a native AoT compiled .NET 8 application using this package to EKS and observed no issues related to this change and the native AoT compilation warning is no longer present.

@Kielek Kielek added the comp:instrumentation.aws Things related to OpenTelemetry.Instrumentation.AWS label Jan 24, 2024
Add `net6.0` TFM and fix nullability warnings.
Fix IDE0090 suggestions.
Mark `AWSTracingPipelineHandler` as `sealed` as a hint to the JIT to devirtualize calls.
Update changelog with .NET 6 and AoT changes.
@martincostello
Copy link
Contributor Author

Could I get an ETA on when this will be merged and when there will be a new release of the packages updated by this PR as well as #1545 and #1541?

I've a number of applications where I'd like to consume the changes in as these packages are the blocker for native AoT working in them correctly.

Alternatively, if there's a pre-release feed for NuGet packages from your CI I can consume those in the meantime.

@Kielek
Copy link
Contributor

Kielek commented Jan 26, 2024

Merging as @srprash, agreed that @normj can act as component owner in #1539. There is only some technical requirements to merge mentioned PR.

If we speaking about release - please follow process from https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-dotnet-contrib/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#how-to-request-for-release-of-package

@Kielek Kielek merged commit a8f7bb8 into open-telemetry:main Jan 26, 2024
32 checks passed
@martincostello martincostello deleted the issue-1543 branch January 26, 2024 11:58
@martincostello
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Kielek Thanks - I've raised #1551, though I think the mentioned team is private as it hasn't tagged them due to my permissions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
comp:instrumentation.aws Things related to OpenTelemetry.Instrumentation.AWS
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

AWSTracingPipelineHandler produces IL2075 warning when compiling for native AoT
4 participants